
Canadian Election - Turning Bad
By Harold Lavender
The Canadian federal election to be held January 23,is unlikely to resolve
an ongoing political crisis of governability. Instead it is likely to
produce another minority government of unknown duration.
However, given the lack of alternatives there is little to cheer about.
Indeed, at this point the race has shifted to the point where a minority
right -wing Conservative government appears probable.
In December the opposition parties, of very diverse stripes, banded together
to win a non-confidence motion brining down the Liberal minority government
of Paul Martin. The Liberal government has been shown as flagrantly corrupt.
The Gomery Commission found evidence of " an elaborate scheme of kickbacks"
in the federal sponsorship program in the province of Quebec.
This systemic scandal created disgust in Quebec, which is 80 percent
francophone and fuelled mass sentiment in the words of a popular song to
"liberate us from the Liberals." The prime beneficiary is the
pro-sovreigntist Bloc Quebecois which appears poised for a close to complete
sweep of Quebec seats. Many in Quebec view themselves as a separate nation.
A 1995 referendum on sovereignty failed with 49 percent voting Yes.
The current strength of the Bloc Quebeois makes it difficult for either
the Liberals or Conservatives to form a majority federal government.
The scandal ridden Liberals who have lengthy track record of promising
reforms at election time and never delivering certainly deserve to be
turfed out..
They are trying to make people forge their record with messages that the
economy is strong. Rising natural resources revenues and exports have
fuelled economic growth. Corporations and the wealthy have been the big
winners
Since 1984 majority Conservative (Brian Mulroney) and Liberal (Jean
Chretien) governments have rammed through the neo-liberal agenda of free
trade and cutbacks to public services, benefiting capital at the expense of
the working class and poor ,whose increasingly desperate plight is
highlighted by the rapid increase in homelessness..
The Liberals are banking on fear of Conservative leader Stephen Harper, a
social conservative , from the oil rich and right-wing province of Alberta
to keep them in office.
Harper wants to re-open the issue of same sex marriage legalized by court
rulings and then Parliament in 2005.
In the 2004 election the Liberals staved off defeat by successfully
attacking Harper for wanting to send Canadian troops to Iraq. But will
the fear factor be enough this time?
The Liberals began the race ahead., But now the Conservatives have surged
into the lead in the polls They appear to have found a successful wedge
issue with "Get tough on Crime" ,The Conservatives are also promising major
tax cuts. Their figures don't add up which means a future Conservative
government would likely run a deficit and/or make drastic cuts to
federally funded social programs
The social democratic New Democratic party (NDP) trying to position itself
as an alternative "to corruption and conservatism is running at 18 percent
in the polls. The Bloc Quebeocis has
12 percent (50 percent in Quebec) and the Greens 5.
Small Expectations
Most progressive or soft left opinion (the far left is tiny) in Canada
outside Quebec favours the return of a Liberal minority with the NDP
holding the balance of power. From a narrowly "realist" perspective this is
viewed as the most favourable scenario to win reforms. Though for others it
is quite pathetic and wrong headed to look to the Liberals as deliverers of
reforms or the best we can expect.
No Left Turn
The federal NDP ,was largely irrelevant in 1990's(a few outspoken MP's
aside) dropping to under 10 percent electoral support. In 2002 a new
leader Jack Layton set out to revive the party. Last election the NDP vote
rose back to 16 percent but this did not translate into seats (the NDP got
19 seats- as opposed to nearly 50 under proportional representation).
Some on the left saw the ascension of Layton as an oportunity. Others,
including this author were sceptical seeing primarily as as move to
modernize the NDP's image and increase its appeal to left liberal opinion)
Last year the Liberals had to accept NDP amendments to pass their budget.
The Liberals deferred (to be introduced in other ways) big corporate tax
cuts and agreed to an extra $4 billion in badly needed social and
infrastructure spending. (little yet delivered).
The NDP choose to identify the budget as its own and proclaim this is what
electing more NDP MP's in Ottawa can do. However, the budget contained a
number of heinous features, most notably plans for multi-billion dollar
increases in military spending
In this campaign the drift of the NDP to the liberal centre has continued.
Jack Layton has differentiated on a few issues ,opposing prizatization of
health care and favouring social inveestment of the federal surplus rather
than new tax cuts. However Layton has stressed the NDP will be fiscally
responsible (ie balance the budget) and will not raise corporate taxes.
The NDP has also fallen into line with the Conservative law and order
theme unveiling its own plan to "fight crime".
On foreign policy the NDP has opposed the war in Iraq and the George W.Bush
agenda . But it has failed to challenge the Canadian military, the false
image of Canada as a peacekeeper the war on terrorism and Canadian
imperialism In particular the NDP has not spoken out against Canda's role
in the occupation of Haiti and Afghanistan.
Poor Choices
Many will vote for the NDP because there it is theonly palatable choice on
the ballot.
The Greens are runing in all riding, but are not left Under leader Jim
Harris a former Conservative they have a pro-market orientation.
However many will not vote -beause they see no one worth voting for or believe that all politicians and parties are liars. Voterturnout in Canada, comparable to Britian is falling and could hit record lows this election
In the late's 1990's there was a rise of the global justice movement, growth
of vague anti-capitalist sentiment and support for direct action. However
these new movements have stalled in the more repressive post 9/11 climate
Much of the new radicalization that has occurred is strongly
anti-electorlaist.
Many issues of concern from anti-poverty, to aboriginal rights, to the
environment to anti racism and immigrants and refugee rights, to Canadian
imperialism are off the electoral agenda.
Mass mobilization and sentiment pressured the Liberals not to send troops
to Iraq. (but has since fallen off dramatically) This election
mobilization appears much too low to impact the campaign. Episodic
mass working class struggles continue ,however they are largely occurring
at a provincial level.
Without broad struggles- the situation can easily shift to the right.
The Perils of Strategic Voting
Some hope to counter the the prospect of a Tory government regarded as the
main threat via strategic voting . Put simply this means voting Liberal
expect in seats where the the NDP has a strong chance of winning.
The Canadian Auto Workers, once viewed on the left of the union movement
have openly embraced this strategy. Prime Paul Minister Martin addressed
the CAW convention, a sorry and opportunist spectacle The strategy adopted
by CAW President Buzz Hargrove has sparked considerable criticism. However,
most of the criticism has been social democratic.
The notion of a Liberal-labour alliance is poisonous and would be a step
backward for working class independence One need only check the results of
US labour's ties to the Democratic party
>
But a larger problem is the the NDP's conversion to social liberalism.
Where it does hold office provincially it governs in a manner similar to
New Labour in Britain
As a result the NDP is highly vulnerable to strategic voting. The NDP is
hoping to gain seats but this could evaporate on election night.
Canadian Nationalism
Nationalism has been prominent this campaign Prime Minister Martin stepped
up public attacks on George Bush (to play to widespread anti-Bush
sentiment). The US ambassador to Canada, David Wilkins publicly said that
anti-American electoral rhetoric could do long term damage to Canada-US
relations. The NDP is attempting to outbid the Liberals in its appeal to
Canadian nationalism
The Conservatives have also tried to mask their agenda by changing their
tune. Conservative ads say " Stand up Canada vote Conservative."
Their plans for further major increases in military spending are wrapped in
the Canadian flag.
Is Canadian nationalism progressive? A sector of the small radical left
including the New socialist Group say no.
Canada often acts a junior partner of US imperialism but it is an
imperialist power in its own right. Canada capital has gone global
expanding its foreign direct investments by 500 percent in the last 15
years.
Canada is historically a colonial settler state. By far the most oppressed
section of the population are aboriginal people(3 percent of the population)
whose national rights have not been recognized.
Today, the Canadian state is tightening national and border security
through a racist crackdown against refugees and immigrants.
Finally the issue of "national unity " persists and has been quite
prominent in election campaign with the Liberals playing to fear of "
Quebec separatism"
The Liberal government passed a Clarity Bill which would seek to put
conditions on (in effect deny) Quebec's right to self-determination The
NDP has backtracked and openly support this law.
Some Canadian nationalist would paint the Conservatives (pro Washington) and
the Bloc Quebeocis as twin enemies of Canada.
The left in Canada outside Quebec needs to take a totally different course
To advance it needs to seek to find common cause with the left in Quebec(
the broad mass of which is pro-sovereigntist)
Unfortunately in both its reaction to the Gomery Commission (viewed as an
unwelcome diversion) and the federal election ,it has blown any chance to
make alliances.
January 23, could be a bad night. To get beyond it will require a resumption
of mass struggle . But equally, clear political perspectives are needed.
Jan 2006
> > home page > >