SP
convenor, and why should the comrades vote for you?
Colin Fox:
I want the Scottish Socialist Party to grow from here in to what can be seen as
the early stages of a mass party. We have 3000 members and 130000 people voted
for us 18 months ago and I want to see the party tap into the potential. Not
just what the 130000 clearly reveals but we know that our potential support lies
considerably beyond that. It is against a background where labour and the SNP,
our principle opponents for the working class vote in Scotland are moving
considerably to the right.
I think that is the
primary challenge that the SSP faces. And I think I am the best candidate for
tapping into that potential.
Socialist Unity:
How do you see the relationship between the SSP as an electoral party, and its
tradition of commitment to the class struggle, and the movements outside
parliament.
Colin Fox:
They are entirely complementary and they always have been. We stand in elections
but it is not the only thing we do. I have spent 18 months as an MSP and during
that time I was on the picket line every single day of the nursery nurses
dispute; I've recently been on the picket line with the PCS strikers in
Edinburgh and Dundee; I've been involved in campaigns, including a very
successful one in Edinburgh to prevent the closure of a primary school - the
first defeat the council in Edinburgh have had in 12 years. So I have been
involved in what the party have been doing in the parliament. Recently, last
week in fact, I introduced a bill which was part of the SSP's election manifesto
to abolish NHS prescription charges in Scotland. What we do in the parliament is
important, and it is part of an array of fronts that we fight on. It is no more
or less important than others. But it is quite simply that: a part of a rainbow
of fronts that we fight on: industrial, community, electoral; every front that
we can.
I think that is why we
fought to get six MSPs elected. Six MSPs who have worked very, very hard in the
last 18 months to fulfil the party's wishes. It is no more important than any
other part of the party's work: it is certainly no less important either.
Socialist Unity:
What do you think the pros and cons of having a convenor either inside or
outside of the parliament would be?
Colin Fox:
I don't think there is any question that either Alan McCombes or myself would be
standing for Convenor if Tommy Sheridan had not resigned. Nobody in all
likelihood would be standing against Tommy for the convenorship. I think we have
to take on what that involves. A lot of the suppositions about convenors inside
the parliament, or a convenor outside the parliament, or two convenors or five
convenors, etc. are understandable, but are an overreaction to Tommy's
resignation. We have one convenor - I think this is the right way forward - to
have one convenor doing the job working in tandem with a team of people. That is
what Tommy did. I have not been convinced of the reason for any structural
change: it is a question of filling the position. And making sure that the
genuine collegiate approach; the team approach that we have to working together
continues. That would be my approach as a convenor.
Alan
McCombes is the SSP's policy co-ordinator. Alongside Tommy Sheridan, he played a
crucial role in the anti-poll tax movement. His 1988 pamphlet, "How To Beat The
Poll Tax", written a year before the tax was introduced, set out the strategy of
a nationwide non-payment campaign.
Socialist
Unity: Why are you
standing to be SSP
convenor, and why should the comrades vote for you?
Alan McCombes:
I was persuaded to stand by a combination of rank and file activists in our
working class Glasgow heartlands and by a group of our MSPs in parliament. They
convinced me because they had confidence in my judgement, my track record, my
preparedness to fight for progressive, socialist politics in Scotland; within
the party and outside the party. But also because they believe - including MSPs
- that we no need to escalate our extra-parliamentary dimension of the party. We
need to continue the stalwart work we are doing on parliament particularly
around free school meals and scrap the council tax legislation, free
prescription charges. And over the next few months we will be fighting a general
election campaign; we will be mobilising against the godfathers of corporate
capitalism when they descend on Perthshire in July for the G8 summit. We will be
launching along with further parties an independence convention; we will be
stepping up the campaign to bring troops home from Iraq. We will be escalating
our opposition to the evil detention centres and to the nuclear weapons of mass
destruction located just 20 miles from the centre of Glasgow, we will be
fighting for a new pension system and against low pay among young people.
None of these are within the powers of the Scottish parliament, because it is a
cut down parliament, and there is a strong feeling that we cannot allow our
ambition to be stunted within the parameters laid down by Westminster. So from
that point of view my intention to stand is based in the ideas we need a full
time party convenor outside of the parliament. We also respect the fact that we
do need a separate figurehead within the parliament, Colin Fox and the other 5
MSPs are all more than capable of playing that role of fronting our
parliamentary work and acting as media spokespersons. But we desperately need a
full time convenor outside parliament as well to pull together the different
strands of our work: including directing some of the focus to outside of the
parliament.
Socialist Unity:
How do you see the future of the party over the medium term, going through the
next Holyrood elections and beyond?
Alan McCombes:
We have made remarkable progress in the first 5 years of the party. When I first
drew up proposals for a Scottish Socialist party it was denounced by many people
in the UK and international left as utopian, saying we cannot unite the left in
Scotland - that we would be fighting like ferrets in a sack; that we would be
uniting four organisations into ten.
That was 7 years ago -
we have proven them wrong - the SSP is still together; it is a vibrant party, a
diverse party, but it is a unified party. I believe what we have to do now is
build on the profile that we have achieved through our parliamentary
breakthrough, but we have to turn very forcibly now towards the 50% of the
population who do not vote. Not because they are apathetic but because to them
party politics appears irrelevant to them may of them are contemptuous of
politics and a huge proportion of that 50% of the disaffected electorate are
young people. I believe that is out biggest source of recruitment into the party
and the biggest reservoir of increased votes, even if we didn't poach a single
vote from Labour or the SNP we could double our support in society as a whole by
making a radical appeal to young people, to those who now don't vote for
anybody. I think we do that by direct action outside of parliament. We had an
MSP arrested last week for protesting against nuclear weapons, and by spending
one night in prison that had a massive effect on our profile in the media. We
achieved more with that one action than with a hundred speeches in the
parliament building. So we have to be a party of direct action but also a party
that is not just playing the Holyrood game but also a party that is raising
strongly our vision of international socialism, of an independent Scottish
socialist republic that can play its part in the fight back against global
capitalism. We need to reconnect with the idealism of young people, and that is
certainly where I would be trying to influence the party.
January 2005