What lies behind Livingstone's suspension?

Charlie Pottins



Livingstone - defending himself against undemocratic attempts to suspend him LONDON's mayor Ken Livingstone is still in office, a high court judge having halted his suspension, hours before it would have taken effect. The stay of execution represents a partial victory, as Mayor Livingstone seeks a judicial review of last week's decision by the Adjudication Panel for England, the government body supposed to deal with serious disciplinary cases involving local government, over complaints that he offended an Evening Standard reporter who accosted him outside a party.

The case is unlikely to be heard for several weeks. Without the stay of execution, Livingstone would have been obliged to step down today. The decision of the unelected panel to remove the elected mayor from office for a month was widely criticised. During his suspension the mayor would have been unable to perform duties relating to policing, transport and the Olympics.

Accusing the Evening Standard of censoring swearing by their reporter from their recording of the exchange, Ken Livingstone also pointed to the way the Board of Deputies of British Jews had seen the case as an opportunity to have a go at him over his criticisms of Israel.

"Some time before this incident was blown out of all proportion the Board of Deputies asked to meet me to urge me to tone down my views on the Israeli government ... I think they saw this as an opportunity for them to try and hush me on it. It hasn't worked".

As I have pointed out on my blog, the Board's moves came with an international campaign by the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Centre condemning Livingstone as an "antisemite" because of his views on the Middle East. Jewish Londoners who wrote telling the US organisation it was wrong were ignored, just as Oslo's Jewish community was ignored when it tried to correct a Simon Wiesenthal Centre report about events in Norway. Rich Uncle in America knows what's good for us.

Many Jewish people, even those who don't share Livingstone's views, are unhappy at the way the Board has lent itself to the campaign, and been instrumental to efforts to dislodge an elected mayor. They say it was at least ill-judged and out of proportion to the supposed offence.

There was supposed to be a demonstration against Ken Livingstone when he spoke at the Hackney Empire last night. It had been thought some of the characters who demonstrated last November against the "Skies Are Weeping" concert might turn out. But maybe the weather was too cold for the Zionists, or having prematurely assumed a victory courtesy of the Adjudication Panel, they had laid their "indignation" to rest. Inside the theatre, after hearing Ken speak, the audience voted by something like two thirds that he should not have been suspended.

The singing star of the "Skies Are Weeping" concert did make a return appearance last night, albeit as a member of the public, contributing from the auditorium this time. In an e-mail to friends last night Deborah Fink writes:

"Well, I've just come back from a bit of BoD bashing which you may wish to hear about.I went to the Hackney Empire to join the counter demo to the demo against Ken. Alas (!) there was no demo against Ken, just people supporting him. Sarah Colborne (PSC) was there and we decided to go in.We sat at the front, but on the side. At the beginning, there was a majority vote that No, Ken should not have been suspended, (was on BBC London News, 10.30pm). At the end, we could ask questions on topics not already covered. Tactically, I then moved to the centre, by chance wearing my orange jumper (works every time!). I said something along the lines of this:

'To return to the issue of Ken's suspension, I would like to say this for the record, and for the press. I am a Jew. You may be aware that the Board of Deputies of British Jews made the initial complaint against Ken. The Jewish community did not elect the BoDs. They do not speak on behalf of most of us. Their agenda, as with the Chief Rabbi, seems to me, to act as an extension of the Israeli Embassy. They seem to want to get rid of Ken as he continually criticises Israel. By continually crying wolf in regard to anti-Semitism, when there is real anti-Semitism, no one will care! Israel wants there to be anti-Semitism so all Jews move to Israel'....... Interrupted by and followed by round of applause".
 

Applause which I'll echo. I could not have put it better myself, Debbie.

 

 

Transcript of the conversation between Livingstone and Finegold

 

March 2006

> > home page > >